Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright’s Documents Were Doctored

The Kleiman v. Wright case continues this and a slew of evidence has been submitted to the Southern District of Florida courthouse. A supplemental affidavit stemming from the Kleiman estate’s expert witness, Dr. Matthew Edman, indicates tha
Source: devcoins
Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright’s Documents Were Doctored

Related posts

Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright’s Documents Were Doctored

Kleiman's Expert Witness Claims So-Called 'Bitcoin Inventor's' Documents Were Doctored

The Kleiman v. Wright case continues this week and a slew of evidence has been submitted to the Southern District of Florida courthouse. A supplemental affidavit stemming from the Kleiman estate’s expert witness, Dr. Matthew Edman, indicates that documents submitted to the court as evidence were “modified” and “backdated.”

Also Read: Bitcoin Cash Scaling Benchmarks, Brewdog, and Rising Transaction Volume

Plaintiff’s of Documents Shows David Kleiman’s PGP Signature Was Created Almost a Year After He Died

A transcript of an affidavit was recently submitted to the Kleiman v. Wright (9:18-cv-80176) court case, which shows that an expert witness found many flaws within certain documents filed in the case. The billion-dollar bitcoin lawsuit is one of the most high profile court cases in the U.S. because it involves 1 million BTC and self-proclaimed ‘Bitcoin inventor’ Craig Wright. Since December 2015, the crypto community has endured Wright’s repeated claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto. However, nearly every claim and every so-called proof Wright has provided has been debunked by researchers, cryptographers, and the greater crypto community. Many of the refutations against Wright’s story accuse him of providing backdated documents and proofs that have been modified at a later date. From the beginning of Wright’s entrance into the community, his story has been suspected of being a falsified tale or hoax. On December 9, 2015, Vice reporter Sarah Jeong detailed that the “PGP keys referenced in stories naming Craig Wright as the creator of Bitcoin were probably falsely backdated.”

Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright's Documents Were Doctored
The set of keys that were reportedly “backdated and point to a hoax” according to Vice reporter Sarah Jeong, Motherboard staff writer Jordan Pearson, and Bitcoin Core developer Greg Maxwell.

Fast forward to today and Craig Wright is being sued by Ira Kleiman, the brother of the now deceased David Kleiman, for allegedly interfering with David’s bitcoin assets and intellectual property after he died. The first filing shows the value of the assets the Kleiman family thinks David was screwed of is around $5.1 billion before punitive or treble damages. This week, an affidavit was submitted to the court that shows the testimony of the Kleiman estate’s witness, Dr. Matthew Edman, a cryptography expert.

According to Edman’s resume submitted to the court, he has a deep knowledge of digital forensics, applied cryptography, Shamir’s Secret Sharing Scheme, and cryptocurrencies. Edman’s testimony examines an email that was submitted to the court as “Exhibit A.” Edman declares under penalty of perjury that he believes Exhibit A was likely created from an email Wright sent to himself on or about April 16, 2014. The document was then “converted to a PDF and modified to appear to have been sent from ‘Dave Kleiman’ to Uyen Nguyen on or about December 20, 2012.” The expert’s testimony further states:

I also determined that Exhibit A contained a PGP signature allegedly created by Dave Kleiman on or about March 12, 2014 – almost a year after he died.

Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright's Documents Were Doctored

A Trend of Modifications

Edman states that he analyzed Exhibit A previously and further analysis and forensic artifacts contained within the PDF itself bolster his opinion. The digital forensics expert said that he also examined “Exhibit F” and concluded that the document was “created by further modifying Exhibit A to make it appear as if Exhibit F is a separate email sent from Dave Kleiman to Uyen Nguyen.” “In my opinion, it is simply revision to the PDF created from an email the defendant sent to himself on or about April 16, 2014,” Edman emphasized in his testimony. The witness’s affidavit declares that both Exhibit A and Exhibit F appear to be emails sent from David to Uyen Nguyen back in 2012, but “manipulations of a PDF created from an email” indicate that Wright sent it to himself in the spring of 2014. Edman noted that he understands that Exhibit A was withdrawn from the court because Wright could not “verify the date of that email exchange,” but to his knowledge Exhibit F was not withdrawn.

Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright's Documents Were Doctored

Edman goes on to explain that the metadata tied to the first exhibit’s PDF shows that it was created on or about April 17, 2014. The creator used the Acrobat PDF Maker 11 for Microsoft Outlook and Edman highlights that the computer’s time zone was consistent with Sydney, Australia (UTC+10) and then modified again five minutes later. Further analysis of the internal contents and structure of the document identified specific portions of the PDF were edited and revised. He further determined that Exhibit F was also comprised of modifications to the date field and revisions to the body of the document as well. Speaking on Exhibit A’s analysis Kleiman’s expert witness explained:

I identified a “TouchUp_TextEdit” marked-content point in the PDF file associated with Exhibit A which indicated that the text associated with the “From:”, “To:”, and “Date:” fields at the top of Exhibit A were edited.

Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright's Documents Were Doctored

The crypto community has not been kind about the latest documents and Edman’s affidavit has been shared widely across social media mocking Wright. The attorney Stephen Palley who often comments on cryptocurrency related lawsuits stated “you can’t really attack [Edman’s] credentials and the analysis looks sound.” “You have to show an alternative explanation — they should settle,” Palley added. The public still hear from Wright’s expert witnesses which include Brett Roberson, Kevin Madura, and Nchain’s CTO Steve Shadders.

Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright's Documents Were Doctored

In addition to the court case drama last week, news.Bitcoin.com reported that Martti Malmi said on Twitter that he might take action against Wright for accusing him of starting the “Silk Road, Hydra and a number of other darker websites.” “Taking a closer look to the transcript, Craig Wright is accusing me and Theymos of soliciting drug trade, assassinations, terrorism and child porn — That is too much to be ignored,” Malmi told the public. Following the accusations against Malmi, the owner of Bitcointalk.org, Theymos, also refuted Wright’s court claims against him stemming from the June 28 transcript. “I was made a forum admin in 2011 after Satoshi left,” Theymos insisted.

“I never had any interaction with CSW — CSW’s whole shtick is to just lie constantly,” the forum moderator conceded. “He’s so brazen about it that some people think, ‘there must be some truth there,’ but really it’s 100% nonsense.”

What do you think about the Kleiman v. Wright lawsuit involving billions of dollars worth of bitcoin? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.


Image credits: Shutterstock, Courtlistener, Twitter, Florida Case Kleiman v. Wright (9:18-cv-80176), Vice, and Pixabay.


Are you feeling lucky? Visit our official Bitcoin casino you can play BCH slots, BCH poker, and many more BCH games. Every game has a progressive Bitcoin Cash jackpot to be won!

The post Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright’s Documents Were Doctored appeared first on Bitcoin News.


Source: bitcoin.com
Expert Witness in Satoshi Case Claims Dr Wright’s Documents Were Doctored

Related posts

Bitcoin Could Have Seen Its Last Ever Dip Below $10k

bitcoin

The past saw bitcoin price pull-back 30%, and then quickly recover. But historical analysis suggests we have seen the end of the sub-$10k bitcoin for good.


Pullbacks During Bitcoin Runs

While the recent pullback from 2019 highs may have been concerning for some, a look back through bitcoin price history shows that they are actually pretty commonplace.

From mid-2015 through to the December 2017 all-time high, there were 8 such pullbacks occurring every 98 on average. Each of these was followed by a new surging uptrend, which eventually drove BTC to $20,000.

As pointed out by Blocktown Capital managing partner, James Todaro, this could mean that we may have seen the last major dip until November – and potentially the last time we’ll ever see Bitcoin under $10,000.

Last Chance To Buy At Under $10k

As we are still in the early stages of this bull market, most analysts believe we still have a long way to .

The most recent pullback saw bitcoin dip back under the psychologically significant $10k level. Shortly after however, it was snapped up by eager buyers who managed to force momentum back in the opposite direction.

So with bullish sentiment still high, it seems unlikely that we witness another opportunity to buy at under $10,000 this time around. But could bitcoin price ever go back to four figures?

Considering Yearly Lows

To determine this we could possibly look to yearly lows. These indicate the growth of HODLers, and the price below which they will not sell under any circumstances.

In 2018 the yearly low was $3200, off the back of an 85% crash in bitcoin price from its all-time high. This was still a full 4 times the previous yearly low of $780, off the back of both a monumental bull and bear market.

As we are at the of a new bull market cycle right now, it seems very unlikely that we will dip as low again – even if the price does crash later on in the year.

But what of our all-time high? Prolonged bear markets have historically wiped around 85% off previous ATHs. Where would the end of this bull have to be, in order to put $10k back in reach of a crash of this magnitude?

Folks of a religious disposition may want to look away now. The magic number which would see an 85% drop take us back to $10k, is $66.6k.

So as long as we moon by Christmas, we’ll be fine.

Do you think we’ll ever see sub-£10K bitcoin again? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below!


Images courtesy of Twitter @JamesTodaroMD, Shutterstock

The post Bitcoin Could Have Seen Its Last Ever Dip Below $10k appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.


Source: bitcoinist
Bitcoin Could Have Seen Its Last Ever Dip Below k

Related posts

Bitcoin should witness correction, but longer consolidation at the top would take the price higher, claims Tone Vays

After the recent correction in prices, Bitcoin’s valuation was again debate: whether the present market volatility will pump the virtual asset’s price or another pullback be witnessed. Vinny Lingham, CEO of Civic, recently discussed the possibility of Bitcoin going $3000 and stated that the cycle “wasn’t necessarily over.” Now, Tone Vays, […]
Source: bitcoinwarrior
Bitcoin should witness correction, but longer consolidation at the top would take the price higher, claims Tone Vays

Related posts